United States securities and exchange commission logo





                             October 18, 2023

       Zhengbin (Bing) Yao, Ph.D.
       Chief Executive Officer
       ArriVent Biopharma, Inc.
       18 Campus Boulevard, Suite 100
       Newtown Square, PA 19073

                                                        Re: ArriVent Biopharma,
Inc.
                                                            Amended Draft
Registration Statement on Form S-1
                                                            Submitted October
4, 2023
                                                            CIK 0001868279

       Dear Zhengbin (Bing) Yao:

            We have reviewed your amended draft registration statement and have
the following
       comment(s).

              Please respond to this letter by providing the requested
information and either submitting
       an amended draft registration statement or publicly filing your
registration statement on
       EDGAR. If you do not believe a comment applies to your facts and
circumstances or do not
       believe an amendment is appropriate, please tell us why in your
response.

               After reviewing the information you provide in response to this
letter and your amended
       draft registration statement or filed registration statement, we may
have additional comments.

       Amendment No. 1 to Draft Registration Statement on Form S-1

       Prospectus Summary
       Overview, page 1

   1.                                                   We note your response
to comments 1 and 2. However, you continue to make statements
                                                        relating to safety and
efficacy related to ongoing clinical trials of furmonertinib. Please
                                                        note, we do not object
to statements indicating that trial participants experienced a
                                                        measured reduction in
tumor size of at least 30%, but object to statements indicating that
                                                        the trial demonstrated
a 79% overall response rate. Your objective observations should not
                                                        conclude that the
results were due to your product candidate. Such a determination of
                                                        efficacy is a
determination that is within the sole authority of the FDA or equivalent
                                                        foreign regulator.
Please revise the following statements accordingly:

                                                              "furmonertinib
demonstrated a 79% (n=22 out of 28 patients) confirmed overall
 Zhengbin (Bing) Yao, Ph.D.
FirstName LastNameZhengbin   (Bing) Yao, Ph.D.
ArriVent Biopharma, Inc.
Comapany
October 18,NameArriVent
            2023         Biopharma, Inc.
October
Page 2 18, 2023 Page 2
FirstName LastName
              response rate ... and a 15.2 month median duration of response."
(pages 1, 95 and
              107);
                furmonertinib demonstrated an ORR of 91% and progression free
survival of 20.8
              months in first generation EGFR TKI (page 108) and
                "Phase 1b FAVOUR clinical trial, in which furmonertinib
demonstrated a reduction
              in tumor size of at least 30% from the baseline in 79% of the
first-line patients..."
              (page 112)


         Similarly remove all other statements of efficacy. You may replace
them with objective
         information about the results from the trial without indicating the
conclusion that the
         observed results "demonstrate" a cause and effective relationship
between the product
         candidate and the observation.
2.       Clearly state in the summary that the FDA has not approved
furmonertinib for any use.
3.       We note your response to comment 4 and re-issue the comment. With
respect to the
         number of serious adverse events, please explain why adverse events at
a Grade 3 or
         greater are not all serious adverse events, given the definition of
Grade 3 treatment related
         adverse events as severe or medically significant, requiring
hospitalization or prolongation
         of hospitalization, or disability. We note your FAVOUR trial results
indicate 17 Grade 3
         or higher treatment related adverse events and 6 adverse events.
Please explain how an
         adverse event met the definition of Grade 3 without meeting the
definition of serious
         adverse event. Additionally, balance your disclosure that
furmonertinib "has been
         observed to be generally well tolerated" in multiple clinical trials
with a description of all
         serious adverse events, as opposed to the most common events, and
quantify the number
         of such events.
4.       We note your disclosure that you selected furmonertinib for global
development against
         nonclassical mutations based on "preliminary clinical activity"
observed in exon 20
         insertion mutations. Please revise to clarify the nature of this
clinical activity (e.g., the
         clinical stage and number of subjects). If you are referring to
clinical trials mentioned in
         the filing, please so specify.
Our Pipeline, page 2

5.       We note your response to comment 5. However, we note that your
Furmonertnib
         Development Initiative table on pages 3 and 109 indicates that the
FAVOUR trial in an
         ongoing Phase 1b trial related to Exon 20 1L. While the FDA may have
agreed that to
         your plan to proceed from your Phase 1 to your pivotal Phase 3 trial,
it appears from the
         Development Initiative Table that all Phase 1 trials have not yet been
completed. Please
         explain why your pipeline table indicates that Phase 1 trials have
been completed when
         the Development Initiative table indicates that a 1b trial is ongoing
or revise your pipeline
         table to clarify that you have not completed all Phase 1 trials.
Furmonertinib Development Initiative, page 3
 Zhengbin (Bing) Yao, Ph.D.
FirstName LastNameZhengbin   (Bing) Yao, Ph.D.
ArriVent Biopharma, Inc.
Comapany
October 18,NameArriVent
            2023         Biopharma, Inc.
October
Page 3 18, 2023 Page 3
FirstName LastName

6.       We note you have included studies in your Development Initiative table
that do not appear
         to correlate with items in your pipeline table. For example, the
Development Initiative
         table indicates your FURTHER trial is a Phase 1b trial relating to
second line treatment of
         Exon 20 and first and second line treatment of PACC. However, your
pipeline table does
         not indicate the development of second line treatment for Exon and
PACC. Similarly
         your disclosed intention to pursue Adjuvant trials is not related to a
current pipeline
         program. Please limit the trials presented in the Development
Initiative table to your
         currently material programs and move the information about your plans
for trials related
         to future programs out of the Summary and into the Business section.
7.       With respect to trials that relate to different EGFRm Patient
Populations, please clarify
         whether you expect to perform one trial that will serve the needs of
both indications or if
         you will conduct two separate trials. For example, with respect to
Adjuvant, do you
         expect to conduct separate trials for Exon 20 and PACC or do you
expect to conduct one
         trial for both Exon and PACC?
8.       Explain the meaning of the term "Gated" future planned study in 1L.
Our Strategy, page 3

9.       We note your disclosure on page 4 that you intend to initiate a Phase
3 clinical trial to
         investigate the potential benefit of furmonertinib in the adjuvant
setting. We also note
         tabular disclosure concerning this "planned" Phase 3 trial on page 3
and disclosure on
         page 110 that you "intend to pursue an adjuvant study of furmonertinib
in EGFRm
         NSCLC with uncommon mutations based on results obtained from currently
ongoing
         clinical trials." Please tell us if you have discussed your plan to
proceed directly to a Phase
         3 trial. If you have not, please discuss the risks that the FDA may
require earlier stage
         clinical trials prior to a Phase 3 trial.
If we are required by the FDA to obtain approval of a companion diagnostic in
connection with
approval of any of our product candidates. . ., page 36

10.      We note your response to comment 10. Given your disclosure on page 114
indicating that
         you are utilizing an NGS test for confirming mutations that already is
approved and you
         believe it can be used if furmonertinib is approved. Please revise
this risk factor to clarify
         the basis for your concern that the FDA may require you to obtain
approval of a
         companion diagnostic and why it may object to any of the already
approved tests for
         confirming mutations. To the extent the risk factor discussion applies
to future product
         candidates, please clarify.
Our Strategy, page 112

11.      We note your response to comment 18. However, your revised disclosure
that "a 240 mg
         once-daily dose of furmonertinib demonstrated a reduction in tumor
size of at least 30%
         from the baseline in 79% of first-line patients" inappropriately
indicates that the
 Zhengbin (Bing) Yao, Ph.D.
FirstName LastNameZhengbin   (Bing) Yao, Ph.D.
ArriVent Biopharma, Inc.
Comapany
October 18,NameArriVent
            2023         Biopharma, Inc.
October
Page 4 18, 2023 Page 4
FirstName LastName
         furmonertineb is effective. You may indicate that 79% of the first
line patients in the
         study who were taking a 240 mg once-daily dose of furmonertinib
experienced a 30%
         reduction in tumor size, but you may not indicate your conclusions of
cause and effect.
Licenses, Partnerships and Collaborations, page 128

12.      We note your response to comment 22 and re-issue the comment. Please
revise this
         section to include a discussion of your agreement with Beijing
InnoCare Pharma Co., Ltd.
         Your discussion should describe the cost-sharing arrangement,
including each party's
         rights and obligations including how much of the costs each party is
obligated to fund and
         what rights, if any, each party will have to the data resulting from
the trial. To the extent
         that Innocare, has any rights to furmontinib, as a result of any of
your agreements with
         Innocare or any agreements between Innocare and Allist, please
describe such rights.
         Additionally, please remove or explain the references to Innocare as
your "partner" or
         "collaboration partner" in the pipeline table and throughout your
filing. Given our
         response indicating that your agreement with Innocare is primarily
limited to a cost
         sharing arrangement, it does not appear appropriate to refer to it as
a partner, collaborator
         or to indicate that you are developing furmonertinib with a SHP2
inhibitor ICP-189 with
         Innocare.

         Additionally, provide us with an analysis supporting your conclusion
that you are not
         substantially dependent on your cost sharing agreement with Innocare.
Your analysis
         should address your ability to finance the clinical study on your own
given your other
         financial obligations.
Aarvik Research Collaboration Agreement, page 130

13.      We note your responses to comments 24 and 25 and re-issue in part.
Please quantify all
         amounts paid to Aarvik to date and explain how the amounts of your
"certain research
         costs and expenses" will be determined, for example have you agreed to
fund all research
         costs and expenses, 50% of such research costs and expenses or certain
specific costs and
         expenses. Given that they are estimates, if such amounts have already
been estimated,
         please quantify these amounts.
Financial Statements
Note 7. Convertible Preferred Stock and Common Stock
Convertible Preferred Stocks, page F-12

14.      Please address the following regarding your response to our prior
comment 29 and the
         related revisions made in the financial statements:
             The exception discussed in ASC 480-10-S99-3A3(f) requires that all
holders of
              equally and more subordinated equity instruments would always be
entitled to also
              receive the same form of consideration. Tell us in detail how you
evaluated whether
              there were other hypothetical situations in which the holders of
all equity instruments
              might not receive the same form of consideration.
 Zhengbin (Bing) Yao, Ph.D.
ArriVent Biopharma, Inc.
October 18, 2023
Page 5
             Your conclusion that a Deemed Liquidation Event is solely within
the control of the
           Company appears to be partially based on the assumption that an
insufficient
           redemption amount would cause inherent conflict in economic interest
between the
           Series A and Series B shareholders such that they would never be
incentivized to act
           in concert against the interests of the common shareholders. Please
further explain to
           us how you considered a hypothetical situation where a prospective
buyer offers to
           buyout all your licenses (product candidates) for an amount just
sufficient to redeem
           the full amount for both Series A and B shareholders. Note that
under ASC 480-10-
           S99-3A paragraph 5, the possibility that any triggering event that
is not solely within
           the control of the issuer could occur   without regard to
probability   would require
           the instrument to be classified in temporary equity.

       Please contact Li Xiao at 202-551-4391 or Kevin Vaughn at 202-551-3494
if you have
questions regarding comments on the financial statements and related matters.
Please contact
Dillon Hagius at 202-551-7967 or Suzanne Hayes at 202-551-3675 with any other
questions.



                                                             Sincerely,
FirstName LastNameZhengbin (Bing) Yao, Ph.D.
                                                             Division of
Corporation Finance
Comapany NameArriVent Biopharma, Inc.
                                                             Office of Life
Sciences
October 18, 2023 Page 5
cc:       John Rudy
FirstName LastName